Skip to main content
AgentNet Observer
← Back to Library

Why Do Agent Teams Fail Across Boundaries? A Failure Taxonomy for Agent-to-Agent Systems with Private States

Sarath Shekkizhar, Prathyusha Jwalapuram, Zixuan Ke, Vaidehi Patil, Jiayu Wang, Srijan Bansal, Trong Huy Nguyen, Dingfeng Jiang, Dongqi Liu, Ruochen Zhao, Wei Lu, Giuseppe Carenini, Mohit Bansal, Silvio Savarese, Shafiq Joty

Paper 2026 Published 2026-10-15 arXiv preprint arXiv:2610.19342 [cs.MA] arXiv:2610.19342 Indexed 2026-10-19 A2Amulti-agentevaluationinteroperabilityfailure-taxonomy

Abstract

Agents are increasingly interacting with other agents that act for different principals (people or organizations on whose behalf they work), such as a buyer's personal agent negotiating with an enterprise's seller agent. In such agent-to-agent (A2A) scenarios, each agent has its own environment and holds information and authority that the other cannot see. Moreover, the interests of each agent may be aligned (cooperative), partly aligned (mixed-motive), or opposed (competitive). Existing multi-agent system failure studies assume one orchestrator, shared workspace, or single principal. We ask how A2A systems fail when these assumptions are removed. We study more than 2,500 recorded runs of A2A systems built from different agent harnesses and models, spanning 488 scenarios across eight families (legal, CRM, security, commerce, etc.). From these traces, we derive $A^2$-Failures, a taxonomy of 20 A2A failure modes in four categories: (i) discovery and delegation, (ii) grounding and record consistency, (iii) verification, and (iv) conduct and fidelity. Three findings hold across every harness, model, and scenario studied: (1) discovery and interaction are driven by the phrasing of the task rather than the availability of peer agents; (2) no agent verifies a peer's factual claim on its own initiative, so an A2A system inherits the reliability of its least reliable participant unless the protocol or mechanism performs the check; and (3) the aggregate outcome score credits the agent completing the task while staying blind to the coordination, verification, and conduct failures beneath it, so A2A systems must be evaluated per agent, against each agent's own principal. We release the run logs behind the taxonomy at https://huggingface.co/datasets/a2a-salesforce/a2-failures.

Cite this entry

GB/T 7714-2015

Sarath Shekkizhar, Prathyusha Jwalapuram, Zixuan Ke, et al. Why Do Agent Teams Fail Across Boundaries? A Failure Taxonomy for Agent-to-Agent Systems with Private States[EB/OL]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2610.19342 [cs.MA], 2026(2026-10-15)[2026-10-21]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19342.

BibTeX

@misc{shekkizhar2026,
  author = {Sarath Shekkizhar and Prathyusha Jwalapuram and Zixuan Ke and Vaidehi Patil and Jiayu Wang and Srijan Bansal and Trong Huy Nguyen and Dingfeng Jiang and Dongqi Liu and Ruochen Zhao and Wei Lu and Giuseppe Carenini and Mohit Bansal and Silvio Savarese and Shafiq Joty},
  title = {Why Do Agent Teams Fail Across Boundaries? A Failure Taxonomy for Agent-to-Agent Systems with Private States},
  year = {2026},
  organization = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2610.19342 [cs.MA]},
  howpublished = {\url{https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19342}},
}

Visit source ↗

This entry is part of the AgentNet Observer library. Attribute with a link to this page when quoting.